[svsvincenzo]

Oh yes it does matter, because uncocking through impact and not just to impact provides resistance to clubhead velocity drop off due to impact energy losses. Most of the clubhead velocity is provided by the LW(PA2) being uncocked by pivot power(PA4). PA3 is minimal in comparison, Throwout being principally a delivery mechanism.

svs, the golf stroke is not a left handed top-spin backhand, no matter how badly you want it to be.

No MJ, not a top spin L handed back hand. A L handed backhand powered thru not just by CF and Pivot Power (PA4) but also by PP3, Clubhead Lag Pressure, PA1 and Rotational Power (PA3).

I respectfully disagree with clubhead velocity drop due to impact energy losses. I'm not saying PA2 fully spent before impact. I'm saying fully spent right at impact, but not after. PP3, PA1 and PA3 would still be there releasing the clubhead (throw out). Yoda himself believes in Rotational Power (PA3). And I think this is the reason Homer prefers a four barrel 4-1-2-3 sequence.

IMO, aiming for a Level L wrist at impact, at the least, brings out a host of other problems due to Sweetspot being aimed to be under plane at impact. I mean, a Level L wrist is essentially an under plane Sweetspot at impact. So you have to deal with that, and IMO the actions needed to deal with it causes power leak.

So, why not just get the L wrist fully uncocked already at address, let it be that right at impact by powering thru with 4-1-2-3. This is the only way that IMO we can all achieve PP3, Clubhead Lag Pressure and Flat L Wrist at impact. PA4 starts everything, then PA1 causes the release of the club head (PA2 and PA3). A four barrel stroke. Homer is right all along.